I was able to play with the Samsung Gear S Watch today, and while I like
what I saw, I believe one needs a Bluetooth headset to effectively use it
since the speaker isn't something that's very practical.
It probably would sound a tat better if it has speakers on both sides of the
Watch, but as it stands, it was hard for me to truly give it a fair shake at
the Verizon store.
Overall
Greetings
Didn't know it only works with Samsung devices!
It's also not Android, or Android Wear...
Although, it passes the Dick Tracy test
It is a tiny smart phone with microphone and speaker
Great review:
http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-gear-s-review
Do you think tripple press of the home key enables accessibility?
Just reviewed the user manual and there is no accessibility
Hi,
Wonder if anyone has tried the Samsung Gear watch and if so is there any level of accessibility?
Thanks
Scott
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eyes-free" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi, first of I would like to thank you for a fantastic product.
I have a new Galaxy S6 and have Cerberus installed.
Yesterday I bought a new Samsung Gear S watch and have been trying to
install it with Cerberus.
I went through Opera mini on the phone and downloaded the APK file.
Please save the little hair that I have left on my head and tell me how to
install it n the watch?
Thank you
Hi guys,
I'm using autowear on my Motorola 360 wich interact tasker, on my phone,
and i'm changing channels with my watch but i'm changing it on my Box, with
HTTP request, is there a way to send HTTP request on the TV directly ? I
have a Samsung 2014 connected TV.
I don't know if i'm clear, I'm sorry if I'm not, I don't speak english very
Well.
Actually I'd like a way to interact
WATCH WORLD`S MOST BEAUTIFUL WALLPAPERS EVER.
http://wallpapers-stocks.blogspot.com/
http://wallpapers-stocks.blogspot.com/
http://wallpapers-stocks.blogspot.com/
http://wallpapers-stocks.blogspot.com/
http://wallpapers-stocks.blogspot.com/
http://wallpapers-stocks.blogspot.com/
WATCH WORLD`S MOST FUNNIEST AND HILARIOUS VIDEOS EVER. (MUST WATCH)
http://funnyvideos-2011.blogspot.com/
This is for those of you Tableteers.
Android Authority, (I believe), got their hands on the mammoth--, The 18.4inch Samsung Galaxy view Tablet.
you may watch it on the following youtube Url:
https://youtu.be/l-NTHFM1g80
Have fun.
Warren
Sent from TypeMail
To report violations of our ground rules or content guidelines, contact
[email protected]. -- https://goo.gl
Should I unbind $scope.$on('...'), $rootScope.$on('...') and $scope.$watch('...') ?
Or the angular takes care of it? I'm having a big memory leak, I go back and forward in my app pages, and the memory keeps getting higher.
So, in directive, controller and services, should I unbind the events/watchers?
BTW, I'm using angular 1.2.18.
In my locking implementation, if a thread wants to wait for a lock, it will
create a watcher object, set a watch on the lock before it, and wait on the
watcher. When the watch gets triggered, the watcher notifies any threads
that are waiting on it.
If the session expires, I would like to wake up all of the threads that are
waiting for a lock. To my understanding, only the default watcher receives
Some features can be implemented using $watch or $on event listener.
Is there any difference in performance or advantage of $watch vs $on?
